Amid ongoing geoeconomic tensions, industrial policy has emerged as a prominent tool for policymakers. What are the dynamic and welfare effects of these policies? How does the short-sightedness of policymakers influence their choice of instruments? What are the distributional consequences of these protectionist measures? We address these questions with a dynamic two-country general equilibrium framework that incorporates firm heterogeneity, trade, and the offshoring of tasks. By calibrating the model to the contexts of the US and China, we explore the effects of three popular industrial policies: import tariffs, domestic production subsidies, and entry subsidies. Our findings indicate that, from an initial state free of interventions, myopic policymakers are incentivized to subsidize production, while those more forward-looking favor imposing import tariffs. Although all of these policies initially reduce wage inequality, some result in aggregate welfare losses, either in the short run or the long run.
"Dynamic Effects of Industrial Policies Amidst Geoeconomic Tensions“ "Dynamic Effects of Industrial Policies Amidst Geoeconomic Tensions“
The article “Dynamic Effects of Industrial Policies Amidst Geoeconomic Tensions” by Ziran Ding, Adam Hal Spencer, and Zinan Wang was published in the European Economic Review.
AHS_Bonn.webp
© AHS_Bonn.webp
Download all images in original size
The impression in connection with the service is free, while the image specified author is mentioned.
- Ziran Ding, University of St Andrews Business School
- Adam Hal Spencer, University of Bonn
- Zinan Wang, Ma Yinchu School of Economics, Tianjin University