The full-information rational expectations (FIRE) assumption is at the core of modern macroeconomics. This chapter revisits recent evidence which relates forecast errors of survey participants to news and rejects FIRE at different levels of aggregation. The evidence based on consensus (or aggregate) forecasts testifies against the full-information assumption, the evidence based on data for individual forecasters against rational expectations. In contrast to earlier survey evidence that was largely dismissed as irrelevant, the recent evidence may have a lasting impact for two reasons. First, the global financial crisis of 2007–2008 has led to certain uneasiness with the state of macroeconomics and a readiness to embrace new ideas. Second, the recent literature has put forward a number of promising alternative models of the expectation-formation process. These are reviewed at the end of the chapter.
“On FIRE, News, and Expectations” “On FIRE, News, and Expectations”
The article “On FIRE, News, and Expectations” by Benjamin Born, Zeno Enders, and Gernot J. Müller was published in The Routledge Handbook of Economic Expectations in Historical Perspective.
Benjamin Born
© Universität Bonn / Bernadett Yehdou
Download all images in original size
The impression in connection with the service is free, while the image specified author is mentioned.
Benjamin Born, University of Bonn
Zeno Enders, Heidelberg University
Gernot J. Müller, University of Tübingen